Premium StructuresWhile insurers vary in their approaches to structuring premiums, at least one describes the following progression of premiums reflecting a perception that publishing content posted by subscribers carries a heightened risk:
Not all insurers are currently charging higher premiums to publishers who include interactive features. But all are at least considering that approach, particularly in the wake of the Stratton Oakmont decision. As a general matter, insurers are concerned about the difficulties of evaluating the risks associated with the tradition of uninhibited speech on the Internet, the anti-copyright mentality of would-be hackers and cyberpunk wannabes on the Internet, and the practical difficulties associated with attempting to screen thousands upon thousands of postings on bulletin boards and chat lines. Many deplore the prospect of a legal environment in which cyber-publishers may heighten their risks by taking steps to monitor content or promote civility. Media perils insurers have always preferred insureds who have a demonstrated history of exercising care. A case like Stratton Oakmont threatens to turn that thinking upside down. LINKS: Return to Controlling Risks - Insurance for Cyber-PublishersNovel Risks for Insurers and InsuredsThe Increased Demand from On-line Providers for InsuranceTwo Different Types of Insurance CoverageIndemnification[Home | Attorneys | Practice Areas | Articles | Contact Us | New Uploads | Site Search | CyBarrister Page | Immigration Law Center | Hedgefund Resource] |